Re: Time shift patch causes compile error

[Martin Kaiser <lists () kaiser cx>]

Thus wrote Stig Bjørlykke (stig () bjorlykke org):

> I don't know this code, or truncl() vs. floorl(), but maybe we just
> should use floorl() on all platforms?
> Then we at least get the same behavior.

Haven't looked into that before things stopped compiling today ;-)

gtk/time_shift_dlg.c is the only file where floorl()/truncl() are used.

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html says

There are also built-in versions of the ISO C99 functions
... [list of functions, floorl() is in the list, truncl() isn't] ...
that are recognized in any mode since ISO C90 reserves these
names for the purpose to which ISO C99 puts them.

gcc doesn't get any parameters for a specific mode when I compile wireshark.

floorl() may be the better choice...
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe