Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: text2pcap regression starting from revision 38679


From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:43:22 +0200

Hi,

2011/8/26 Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard () gtech com>

Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@...> writes:

Hi all,since the commit for bug 1723 (done in revision 38679), I'm facing
issues with text2pcap for really small packet dumps.

I guess this is unexpected behavior and should be considered as a bug. Do
you
agree ?

I do and have reopened bug 1723 as a result.  Hopefully, the author of the
text2pcap patch submitted in that bug report is able to fix it.


In the meantime I submitted a patch in bug 1723 activating the ASCII text
dump identification if a new -a option is given to the command line (as the
new code always assume that the ASCII text dump is present).
It would be nice if one of you could have a look (as text2pcap current
behavior is considered as buggy).

Best regards,
Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: