Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: text2pcap regression starting from revision 38679
From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:43:22 +0200
Hi, 2011/8/26 Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard () gtech com>
Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@...> writes:Hi all,since the commit for bug 1723 (done in revision 38679), I'm facingissues with text2pcap for really small packet dumps.I guess this is unexpected behavior and should be considered as a bug. Doyou agree ? I do and have reopened bug 1723 as a result. Hopefully, the author of the text2pcap patch submitted in that bug report is able to fix it.
In the meantime I submitted a patch in bug 1723 activating the ASCII text dump identification if a new -a option is given to the command line (as the new code always assume that the ASCII text dump is present). It would be nice if one of you could have a look (as text2pcap current behavior is considered as buggy). Best regards, Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- text2pcap regression starting from revision 38679 Pascal Quantin (Aug 25)
- Re: text2pcap regression starting from revision 38679 Pascal Quantin (Aug 26)
- Re: text2pcap regression starting from revision 38679 Jeff Morriss (Aug 26)
- Re: text2pcap regression starting from revision 38679 Chris Maynard (Aug 26)
- Re: text2pcap regression starting from revision 38679 Pascal Quantin (Aug 29)
- Re: text2pcap regression starting from revision 38679 Pascal Quantin (Aug 26)