Re: C Bitfield types and alignment

[Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>]

On 12/05/2011 04:41 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
> For example: Given
> struct radiotap_override {
> guint8 field;
> guint align:4, size:4;
> } aaa;
>
> struct radiotap_override {
> guint8 field;
> guint8 align:4, size:4;
> } bbb;
>
> It turns out that:
> sizeof(aaa) = 8
> sizeof(bbb) = 2
>
> Apparently the alignment of the start of the bitfield depends upon the
> (largest ?) bitfield type;

In the 'aaa' structure the compiler will (normally) insert 3 bytes of 
padding between 'field' and the bitfields so that the guint is 4-byte 
aligned; improper alignment isn't allowed on some CPUs (like SPARC) and 
is slow (often/always? requiring 2 memory access cycles to read) on others.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe