Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods
From: Ed Beroset <beroset () mindspring com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:36:19 -0500
Andreas wrote:
Am 11.02.2011 00:06, schrieb Guy Harris: > They weren't omitted on purpose. They were probably omitted because > they were added by a UN*X user; by default, UN*X dynamic shared > libraries export every non-static symbol, unlike Windows DLLs. I think this is a strong argument to move away from the export definition in DEF file to a decoration in the header file. With the prefix like i.e. WIRESHARK_API(1) you can decorate any function that is intended to be public available.
I wonder if there's a way to do this by looking at whether the function is declared static or not.
Ed ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods Turner, Jay (Feb 10)
- Re: libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods Guy Harris (Feb 10)
- Re: libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods Andreas (Feb 10)
- Re: libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods Ed Beroset (Feb 11)
- Re: libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods Andreas (Feb 15)
- Re: libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods Stephen Fisher (Feb 16)
- Re: libwireshark.lib is missing someproto_registrar_* methods Jim Young (Feb 16)
- Re: libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods Andreas (Feb 16)
- Re: libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods Andreas (Feb 10)
- Re: libwireshark.lib is missing some proto_registrar_* methods Guy Harris (Feb 10)