Wireshark mailing list archives
Microsoft vs. clang static analysis
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:36:07 -0700
Now that we're doing static analysis compilation with both Microsoft Visual C++ and clang, I see a lot of effort going into working around shortcomings in the Microsoft static analysis. I've looked at a number of items in the clang static analysis and haven't found a single false positive so far. What's the difference? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Microsoft vs. clang static analysis Stephen Fisher (Feb 17)
- Re: Microsoft vs. clang static analysis Guy Harris (Feb 17)
- Re: Microsoft vs. clang static analysis Gerald Combs (Feb 17)
- Re: Microsoft vs. clang static analysis Guy Harris (Feb 17)
- Re: Microsoft vs. clang static analysis Guy Harris (Feb 17)