Re: ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..()

[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>]

Hi,

 -1.

It adds bloat to the API, adding noting really.

Thanks,
Jaap

On 01/12/2011 08:51 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
> Hi,
> Wouldn't it be handy to have a proto_tree_new_item_get_val_ which would
> return the value
> thus avoiding to having do tvb_get_.. in conjunction with
> proto_tree_new_item() when the value
> is needed in a dissector?
>
> Would an function per field type be necessary? like
> proto_tree_new_item_get_val_int32, proto_tree_new_item_get_val_uint32
> etc or is there a smarter way of doing it?
>
> Any one interested in implementing it?
> Regards
> Anders

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe