Wireshark mailing list archives
snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...?
From: "Sandor, Todd (Todd)" <todd.sandor () alcatel-lucent com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:52:13 -0600
Hi: I had a couple of Ubuntu newbie problems getting Wireshark installed on Unbuntu that included SMI to allow snmp decoding and was finally able to get it to a point where I could configure SMI paths and SMI modules ... I also have a Wireshark on an XP box ... I'm using a shared SMI path (same mib files, same SMI modules names) and when I attempt to decode exactly the same .pcap file on the XP and Ubuntu, I get errors only on Ubuntu (and doesn't perform the decoding) but on the XP version it works fine. Was going to resort to just use the XP version, but thought I would send out an email asking if other people experience this behavior? (I use Ubuntu mainly, it's a little bit of a pain to have to use my XP box for this ...)... Is this just expected behavior under Ubuntu (weaker smi library support?)....I was suggested I use smilint and I did an initial stab at this (admit a some-what weak one), but even the "Standardized MIBs" has some have issues (ones under /var/lib/mibs)... Anyone have any suggestions? On Unbuntu I observe:
Stopped processing module RFC1213-MIB due to error(s) to prevent potential crash in libsmi. Module's conformance level: 1. See details at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560325
... Then after added a SMI path and some private SMI module names on startup I get:
Stopped processing module TIMETRA-SERV-MIB due to error(s) to prevent potential crash in libsmi. Module's conformance level: 1. See details at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560325
--- Windows Version: Version 1.2.6 (SVN Rev 31702) Copyright 1998-2010 Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> and contributors. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Compiled with GTK+ 2.18.5, with GLib 2.22.3, with WinPcap (version unknown), with libz 1.2.3, without POSIX capabilities, without libpcre, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.7.0, with Lua 5.1, with GnuTLS 2.8.5, with Gcrypt 1.4.5, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with PortAudio V19-devel (built Jan 27 2010), with AirPcap. Ubuntu version: Version 1.2.7 Compiled with GTK+ 2.20.0, with GLib 2.24.0, with libpcap 1.0.0, with libz 1.2.3.3, with POSIX capabilities (Linux), with libpcre 7.8, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.7.0, with Lua 5.1, with GnuTLS 2.8.5, with Gcrypt 1.4.4, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with PortAudio V19-devel (built Feb 18 2010 23:31:11), without AirPcap. ---
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Sandor, Todd (Todd) (Jan 17)
- Re: snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Andrew Hood (Jan 18)
- Re: snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Sandor, Todd (Todd) (Jan 18)
- Re: snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Andrew Hood (Jan 19)
- Re: snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Sandor, Todd (Todd) (Jan 20)
- Re: snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Jaap Keuter (Jan 20)
- Re: snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Andrew Hood (Jan 21)
- Re: snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Balint Reczey (Jan 24)
- Re: snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Anders Broman (Jan 24)
- Re: snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Sandor, Todd (Todd) (Jan 18)
- Re: snmp decoding ...ubuntu smi issue ?... different then on windows XP ...? Andrew Hood (Jan 18)