Wireshark mailing list archives
New GCC, new option required?
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:05:23 +0200
Hi list, I think we need a new GCC option added to configure.in: AC_WIRESHARK_GCC_CFLAGS_CHECK(-Wno-unused-but-set-variable)This option came into existence with GCC 4.6 and is causing havoc all over.
I've been going through a lot of dissectors, many of which have either: * unused set variables * variables set for a legitimate purpose, but not used (yet) * bugsTwo bugs are already addressed. I've got some code cleanup done, some stubs.
Remains the generated dissector code which spawns many of these errors. Therefore I think this item is needed.I have lost the use of my development machine for at least another week, so
can't work on this myself. Thanks, Jaap ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- New GCC, new option required? Jaap Keuter (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Jaap Keuter (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Guy Harris (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Kaul (Jul 14)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Stephen Fisher (Jul 14)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)