Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows
From: Chris Maynard <chris.maynard () gtech com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:14:53 +0000 (UTC)
Roland Knall <rknall@...> writes:
On Linux, when the gtk-based filehandler loads the list of plugins, it does so alphabetically. This does not seem to be the case on Windows. So here, someone might argue, that this indeed is plattform-specific, and not exactly a bug. You would have to sort the plugin load list to fix it.
Would this really fix the underlying problem though, i.e., sorting first? I mean, if you want the opensafety plugin to be loaded before the sercosiii plugin, it does, but what if you want the reverse? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Chris Maynard (Mar 07)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Roland Knall (Mar 08)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Chris Maynard (Mar 09)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Roland Knall (Mar 09)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Guy Harris (Mar 09)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Roland Knall (Mar 09)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Guy Harris (Mar 09)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Roland Knall (Mar 14)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Chris Maynard (Mar 09)
- Re: Different wireshark behaviour on Linux as on Windows Roland Knall (Mar 08)