Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: TCP windows update
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:13:10 +0100
On 03/01/2011 09:45 PM, Andrej van der Zee wrote:
Hi Stephen, Thanks for you clear reply.
[SNIP]
Maybe a silly question, but can a Windows update be piggy backed with a data segment, or is it always contained in a zero-length data segment? Also, can a Windows update contain an ACK number for non-ACKed data segments?
I guess Windows(tm) update would love to piggy back onto a data segment, and a Windows(tm) update's ACK number would be the release....
... but I assume that is not what you mean ;) Please be aware of the right terminology, Padawan.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: TCP windows update Andrej van der Zee (Mar 01)
- Re: TCP windows update Guy Harris (Mar 01)
- Re: TCP windows update Andrej van der Zee (Mar 01)
- Re: TCP windows update Guy Harris (Mar 01)
- Re: TCP windows update Andrej van der Zee (Mar 01)
- Re: TCP windows update Martin Visser (Mar 01)
- Re: TCP windows update Andrej van der Zee (Mar 01)
- Re: TCP windows update Guy Harris (Mar 01)