Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: About Dead Store in clang Analysis
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:24:22 -0600
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 08:56:26PM +0100, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
And there is a lot of Dead increment
What it the official solution to fix this ? 1) Remove the code 2) Ignore this warning 3) Comment the code add a /* offset += 1; Remove Clang Dead increment */
I would say #1 - remove the code because it is the cleanest solution. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- About Dead Store in clang Analysis Alexis La Goutte (Mar 24)
- Re: About Dead Store in clang Analysis Stephen Fisher (Mar 24)
- Re: About Dead Store in clang Analysis Dirk Jagdmann (Mar 24)
- Re: About Dead Store in clang Analysis Chris Maynard (Mar 24)
- Re: About Dead Store in clang Analysis Jeff Morriss (Mar 24)
- Re: About Dead Store in clang Analysis John Sullivan (Mar 24)
- Re: About Dead Store in clang Analysis Dirk Jagdmann (Mar 24)
- Re: About Dead Store in clang Analysis Guy Harris (Mar 24)
- Re: About Dead Store in clang Analysis Guy Harris (Mar 24)