Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:23:33 -0600
The Windows buildbots are complaining about this change and I don't know why. I don't have a Windows build to test on, but on Unix it doesn't compain (gcc) even if I add -Wsign-compare.
From (only relevant portions shown):
guint8 num_subrects, subrect_len; guint bytes_needed; bytes_needed = subrect_len * num_subrects; VNC_BYTES_NEEDED(bytes_needed); To: guint8 num_subrects, subrect_len; VNC_BYTES_NEEDED(subrect_len * num_subrects); Where VNC_BYTES_NEEDED is a macro: #define VNC_BYTES_NEEDED(a) \ if(a > (guint)tvb_length_remaining(tvb, *offset)) \ return a; The compiler warning: packet-vnc.c(1970) : warning C4018: '>' : signed/unsigned mismatch Any ideas? On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 02:21:27PM -0700, buildbot-no-reply () wireshark org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis/builds/289 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: vs-code-analysis Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: 36386 Blamelist: sfisher BUILD FAILED: failed nmake all sincerely, -The Buildbot ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis, (continued)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Mar 21)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Mar 21)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Mar 22)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Mar 22)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Mar 22)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Mar 22)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Mar 23)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Mar 24)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Mar 27)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Mar 28)
- Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Stephen Fisher (Mar 28)
- Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Stephen Fisher (Mar 28)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Chris Maynard (Mar 28)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Chris Maynard (Mar 28)
- Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Ed Beroset (Mar 28)
- Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Stephen Fisher (Mar 28)
- Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Stephen Fisher (Mar 28)