Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks
From: Chris Maynard <chris.maynard () gtech com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:47:06 +0000 (UTC)
Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@...> writes:
Is there a better way? Or better yet, a proper solution?
Not claiming this is better or proper, just another alternative: epan/strutil.c: #include <string.h> size_t ws_strlen(const char *s) { if (s == NULL) return 0; return strlen(s); } ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jeff Morriss (May 16)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Chris Maynard (May 16)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Gerald Combs (May 16)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jeff Morriss (May 16)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jakub Zawadzki (May 16)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jeff Morriss (May 16)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Guy Harris (May 16)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jeff Morriss (May 17)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jeff Morriss (May 16)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Chris Maynard (May 16)