Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: New openSAFETY dissector
From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:51:53 +0200
Hello On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
However, if this is the cause of http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-10.04-x64/builds/1452/steps/fuzz-menagerie/logs/stdio then that raises the question "why isn't the SERCOS III plugin being loaded when we're doing the fuzz testing?" If the plugins aren't getting loaded, that means they're not getting fuzz tested. This also raises the question of whether the SERCOS III dissector should be made a built-in dissector.
I will provide a patch fast for checking if the SERCOS III plugin get's loaded, and if the subdissector table is available (you can expect it today). If you want, I will also provide a patch for removing the standalone SERCOS III plugin and integrating it as a built-in dissector. This will take some time, but I guess by monday it should be done. kind regards, Roland ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Guy Harris (May 31)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (May 31)