Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Request setup information to decode LTE RRC/MAC dissection


From: Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson () googlemail com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 18:13:21 +0000

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:07 PM, W T <wokelmal () gmail com> wrote:

Hi,


I am receiving the LTE RRC/MAC message from the eNB as encapsulated UDP
packet to a laptop where wire shark is running.


Are these messages send using the framing format mentioned in
http://wiki.wireshark.org/MAC-LTE ?
If so, then you need only turn on the MAC-LTE protocol preference 'Try
heuristic LTE-MAC over UDP framing'.

If not, then you'll need to create your own dissector for your format,
parse out the required information and call set_mac_lte_proto_data() (see
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/wireshark/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-mac-lte.h)
and call the mac-lte dissector for the PDU itself.


What is the setting i must do in the wireshark to decode the LTE message
that is inside the UDP packet. Will it automatically gives the LTE-RRC and
MAC statistics?


There are currently MAC and RLC statistics, but not RRC...  You should
automatically get those statistics, although for RLC you should check your
MAC-LTE preference settings to ensure that the MAC SDUs are called with
correct RLC format (i.e. mode, sequence number length).

Good luck,
Martin



Best regards
Wo

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: