Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Making threads mandatory
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:44:24 -0800
On 11/7/11 12:38 PM, Michael Tüxen wrote:
On Nov 7, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:Is there any reason we shouldn't remove the thread options from configure.in and CMakeOptions.txt along with USE_THREADS and hard-code thread support?I support this. I don't see a reason why not using them and it only adds additional stuff to test...
Done in r39751. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Making threads mandatory Gerald Combs (Nov 07)
- Re: Making threads mandatory Guy Harris (Nov 07)
- Re: Making threads mandatory Michael Tüxen (Nov 07)
- Re: Making threads mandatory Gerald Combs (Nov 07)
- Re: Making threads mandatory Stig Bjørlykke (Nov 07)