Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page
From: Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 02:44:53 +0000 (UTC)
Balint Reczey <balint.reczey@...> writes:
Why not release a new dev release (based on trunk) to each new release of 1.6.x/1.4.x ?Why should we? The svn repository is public.
Perhaps so more people could try the development releases without requiring them to build it themselves? But that said, I'm not sure a 1-1 development-to-stable release schedule is necessarily the right way to go either since there may be features in progress on the development branch that aren't ready for prime-time when a new stable release is made. - Chris ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- misleading description on Wireshark Download page Dirk Jagdmann (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Gerald Combs (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Alexis La Goutte (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Balint Reczey (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Chris Maynard (Nov 04)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Balint Reczey (Nov 05)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Chris Maynard (Nov 05)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Balint Reczey (Nov 07)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Alexis La Goutte (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Gerald Combs (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Gerald Combs (Nov 07)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Chris Maynard (Nov 08)