Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Send info to plugin
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:45:51 -0700
On Oct 7, 2011, at 4:40 AM, Martin Kaiser wrote:
Thus wrote Guy Harris (guy () alum mit edu):
(At this point, I really wish my name were Zarathustra. :-))
I've been playing with a new port_type PT_DVBCI_SESSION_NUMBER and set both source and destination port to the session number. Does that make sense or is there a better approach?
The ""circuits" for protocols that have a virtual circuit ID of some sort" was based on an existing mechanism in Wireshark, which I put there originally for the benefit of the Frame Relay dissector, and later used in X.25 and elsewhere; see epan/circuit.h and routines using it. It sounds as if DVB-CI has what amounts to a VC ID, the session number. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Send info to plugin, (continued)
- Re: Send info to plugin fab12 (Oct 07)
- Re: Send info to plugin Guy Harris (Oct 08)
- Re: Send info to plugin Martin Kaiser (Oct 07)
- Global conversation Anders Broman (Oct 07)
- Re: Global conversation Stephen Fisher (Oct 07)
- Re: Global conversation Mike Morrin (Oct 07)
- Re: Global conversation Anders Broman (Oct 07)
- Re: Global conversation Anders Broman (Oct 07)
- Re: Global conversation Neil Piercy (Oct 10)
- Re: Send info to plugin fab12 (Oct 07)
- Re: Global conversation Guy Harris (Oct 08)
- Re: Send info to plugin Guy Harris (Oct 08)