Re: updated patch file for bug 5531

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Oct 7, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Ed Beroset wrote:

> Based on the current discussion about the use of the format field for proto_tree_add_item(), I have once again 
> revised the patch file for Bug 5531 ( https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5531 ).  It has gotten a 
> lot of votes and was originally submitted over nine months ago.  Is there something else I should do to help get this 
> in the main build?

See comments in the bug.

Is there either a public specification for C12.12 or, at least, an explanation of the part of the protocol responsible 
for all the ugly stuff in canonify_unencrypted_header()?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe