Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: catching [Malformed Packet]
From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:40:53 +0200
On a similar topic, how can you mark a package as malformed? Especially generated packages often fail the openSAFETY dissector, and marking them as malformed seems to make sense in such cases. Roland Am 24.09.2011 um 18:21 schrieb Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard () gtech com>:
<mmann78@...> writes:Is it possible to setup a display filter to catch all malformed packets (thosenoted as [Malformed Packet] in Info column)? I'm working with a dissector that could probably use a little more "graceful" error checking and I have a few large capture files that I'd like to use to catch any malformed packets created by the current dissector. malformed ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- catching [Malformed Packet] mmann78 (Sep 24)
- Re: catching [Malformed Packet] Chris Maynard (Sep 24)
- Re: catching [Malformed Packet] Roland Knall (Sep 24)
- Re: catching [Malformed Packet] Chris Maynard (Sep 24)
- Re: catching [Malformed Packet] Guy Harris (Sep 24)
- Re: catching [Malformed Packet] Roland Knall (Sep 24)
- Re: catching [Malformed Packet] Martin Mathieson (Sep 24)
- Re: catching [Malformed Packet] Roland Knall (Sep 24)
- Re: catching [Malformed Packet] Chris Maynard (Sep 24)