Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 39143: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-dvbci.c

["Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard () GTECH COM>]

> -----Original Message-----
>
>  From me:
>  Change ENC_NA to ENC_BIG_ENDIAN as i suppose this is a big endian
> protocol and ENC_NA was erroneously used for irems bigger than i byte
> in some cases.

This is a good example of the problem that can occur with using ENC_NA.

Are there any more thoughts to doing something about it?
a) Leave it as it is; it's fine.
b) Eliminate ENC_NA altogether.
c) Define ENC_NA differently from both ENC_LITTLE_ENDIAN and ENC_BIG_ENDIAN.
d) Use proto_tree_add_[type]_[endian]_item() macros instead.
e) <Insert brilliant idea here>

See: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201107/msg00405.html

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential
and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this
email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and 
notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy,
forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe