Re: Transport name resolution considered harmful?

[Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>]

Guy Harris <guy@...> writes:

> Perhaps we should, instead, have our own table of port numbers->protocol names.

In that case, would it make sense to add a preference to allow the user to
choose either the current services file for the mapping or to use the Wireshark
table?  

To help support proprietary/custom port mappings, it would be nice if it were
possible for the user to edit that table.


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe