Re: Should we have "Window size scaling factor: -1 (unknown)" in the packet details, or just leave the scaling factor out?

[<Tim.Poth () bentley com>]

I like having it there
I don't have a proble with how its worded but would this be clearer?
Window size scaling factor: unknown (start of session not captured)



-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 5:49 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Should we have "Window size scaling factor: -1 (unknown)" in the packet details, or just 
leave the scaling factor out?

At least one user was confused by that entry:

        http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/10466/window-size-scaling-factor-unknown

Is it useful at all?  If so, how would it be best rewritten so that it doesn't imply anything other than "the capture 
doesn't contain enough information for Wireshark to know the scaling factor", with no implication that this is a 
network problem?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe