Re: Kasumi code (Was: rev 44384: ... kasumi.h ...)

[Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>]

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:26:04AM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> No, as long as it is only included in source form, there should be no problem
> (at least the Intel lawyers didn't see a problem with putting patentencumbered
> source code into Mesa) as long as this feature is not compiled in by default
> but requires a magic configure switch. This puts the burden of verifying the
> patent compliance on the person that configures Wireshark with that configure
> switch - which is basically the same act as putting the (missing) kasumi source
> files into your build tree and changing the #define in kasumi.h

Attached is the git head version of mesa's docs/patents.txt

Ciao
      Jörg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.

Attachment: patents.txt
Description:

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe