Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers

From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:04:40 +0200

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:08:02PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:

And then fork GCC and clang and enhance them to do string-vs-argument-list checking for our extensions. :-)


Well if we could drop MSVC, and start using C99 (or C11) than definitely yes!
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread:

Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Evan Huus (Aug 14)
- Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Guy Harris (Aug 15)
- Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Jeff Morriss (Aug 15)
  - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers mmann78 (Aug 15)
    - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Jeff Morriss (Aug 15)
  - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Evan Huus (Aug 15)
    - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Jakub Zawadzki (Aug 15)
    - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Guy Harris (Aug 15)
    - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Jakub Zawadzki (Aug 16)
    - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Guy Harris (Aug 16)
    - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Jeff Morriss (Aug 15)
    - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Guy Harris (Aug 15)
    - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Guy Harris (Aug 15)
    - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Gerald Combs (Aug 16)
    - Re: Passing NULL to %s format specifiers Evan Huus (Aug 16)