Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why are authors never Cc'ed before their code is changed?


From: Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 23:29:20 +0000 (UTC)

Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@...> writes:

2012/8/19 Harald Welte <laforge () gnumonks org>
I agree that this massive filter rename could / should have been discussed
before being done

The changes that Michael is making regarding filter renaming stems from
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2794.  Anyone is welcome to
join the discussion there.

In general, renaming filters serves to:
1) Provide a consistent naming scheme.
2) Match the doc/README.developer skeleton code documentation.
3) Avoid unintended display filter name collisions.

In addition, renaming filters has also helped to find/fix some unintentional
duplicate filter names, some of which have manifested themselves as nasty bugs.

Michael's checkfiltername.pl script aids in finding potential candidates; it is
not being globally applied.

- Chris


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: