Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?

From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:05:00 -0500

On 12/14/2012 4:17 AM, Peter Valdemar Mørch wrote:

To this end, I tried your suggestion:
 > tshark -2 -r unfiltered.pcap -R snmp -w snmp.pcap

To which I got:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)


At the very least, thark shouldn't crash.

Please file a bug report at bugs.wireshark.org attaching the file.

This way, the bug can be tracked. In addition, the capture file will beavailable for future testing.



Thanks


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread:

tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Peter Valdemar Mørch (Dec 13)
- Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Guy Harris (Dec 13)
  - Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Peter Valdemar Mørch (Dec 14)
    - Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Bill Meier (Dec 14)
    - Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Sake Blok (Dec 15)
    - Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Guy Harris (Dec 15)
    - Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Peter Valdemar Mørch (Dec 17)