Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Canaries in Wmem
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:20:09 -0800
On 12/21/12 7:54 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
Fair enough. The fuzz-bot (I believe) runs on Linux at the moment, so it could theoretically be fuzzing under valgrind. Gerald, do you know off the top of your head if that would be feasible in terms of performance?
I'll have to do some testing to see how much CPU and memory a Valgrind pass takes but it should be feasible. I just received to more servers intended to upgrade the Wireshark NMS and to help spread the buildbot load so I don't see why we couldn't add a Valgrind step. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Canaries in Wmem Evan Huus (Dec 19)
- Re: Canaries in Wmem Jeff Morriss (Dec 21)
- Re: Canaries in Wmem Jeff Morriss (Dec 21)
- Re: Canaries in Wmem Evan Huus (Dec 21)
- Re: Canaries in Wmem Jeff Morriss (Dec 21)
- Re: Canaries in Wmem Evan Huus (Dec 21)
- Re: Canaries in Wmem Jeff Morriss (Dec 21)
- Re: Canaries in Wmem Guy Harris (Dec 21)
- Re: Canaries in Wmem Evan Huus (Dec 21)
- Re: Canaries in Wmem Gerald Combs (Dec 22)
- Re: Canaries in Wmem Evan Huus (Dec 21)