Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Adding name resolution blocks in Wireshark
From: Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:33:03 +0100
Guy Harris skrev 2012-02-08 21:20:
On Feb 8, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Anders Broman wrote:Should it be safeguarded with a preference?No. Older versions of Wireshark will ignore name resolution blocks, as does libpcap and hence all programs using libpcap to read pcap-ng files.
I was more thinking along the lines that you might not want to save it.On the subject of pcapng features should the structs defined in pcang.c (wtapng_block_t and friends) be moved to wtap-int.h and included in the wtap structure to get at things like interface id and info.
Regards Anders
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Adding name resolution blocks in Wireshark Anders Broman (Feb 08)
- Re: Adding name resolution blocks in Wireshark Guy Harris (Feb 08)
- Re: Adding name resolution blocks in Wireshark Anders Broman (Feb 08)
- Re: Adding name resolution blocks in Wireshark Guy Harris (Feb 08)
- Re: Adding name resolution blocks in Wireshark Anders Broman (Feb 08)
- Re: Adding name resolution blocks in Wireshark Guy Harris (Feb 08)