Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Question about seeing Latency in TCP conversations


From: Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:54:39 +1100

János,

You need to go down to the bottom right corner, in the Y Axis box, and
select Unit: Advanced.

Regards, Martin

MartinVisser99 () gmail com


On 10 January 2012 02:55, János Löbb <janos.lobb () yale edu> wrote:

Hi,

Im my IO Graphs  - version 1.6.2 on OS X 10.6.8 - , I see just he Filter
block but neither the Calc or the variable block.  Where should I set those
to display for me also in IO Graphs ?

Thanks ahead,

János

On Jan 7, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Sheahan, John wrote:

I have filtered out a single conversation and I have the time display set
to “Seconds since previously displayed packet”. I want to now add the time
field to a graph to show how long it took between packets.****
** **
Here is a screen shot of the filtered conversation:****
** **
<image001.png>****
** **
Here is my attempt at adding the Time field for this filtered conversation
to the graph which did not work and I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong:****
** **
<image004.png>****
** **
Thanks,****
** **
johnny****
** **
*From:* wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:
wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] *On Behalf Of *Martin Visser
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2012 5:45 PM
*To:* Community support list for Wireshark
*Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-users] Question about seeing Latency in TCP
conversations****
** **
Johnny,****
** **
The easiest way is to examine the calculated field "tcp.analysis.ack_rtt".
This appears in the details window if you have TCP Sequence Analysis on.**
**
** **
** **
<image002.png>****

****
You have to be a little careful when using this though, as Wireshark
sometimes miscalculates this in the prescence of Duplicate ACKs. The best
way to use it (taking out effects of the server processing delay), is
during the initial handshake. So what I do is filter for "tcp.flags ==
0x12" (which is the SYN/ACK) and plot tcp.analysis.ack_rtt or add it as a
column.****
** **
<image003.png>****
** **

Regards, Martin

MartinVisser99 () gmail com

****
On 5 January 2012 08:20, Sheahan, John <John.Sheahan () priceline com> wrote:
****
I have been given a sniffer trace by our application guys and they want me
to look through it to see if any of the TCP conversations have higher than
normal latencies.****
The file is kind of big and too much data for me to filter and look at
each conversation.****
 ****
Is there an easy way to do this in Wireshark?****
 ****
Thanks****
 ****
Johnny****

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe****
** **
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: