Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version
From: Andreas Sikkema <h323 () ramdyne nl>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:06:03 +0100
On 1/6/12 3:15 PM, Roland Knall wrote:
On another note. If in the long term Qt is the way to go, should all references to gtk usage be replaced by a more generic version of such functions, which in the meantime call the gtk version as a first step? That would allow for the future to prepare a wireshark without gtk and glib. GHashTable for instance get's used quite a lot.
Since getting back into Wireshark development I have this itch somewhere int he back of my head to create a proper OS X version of Wireshark, but have shied away from the amount of work involved ;-) -- Andreas Sikkema ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version, (continued)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Guy Harris (Jan 05)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Gerald Combs (Jan 05)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Roland Knall (Jan 06)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Anders Broman (Jan 06)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Guy Harris (Jan 06)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Roland Knall (Jan 11)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version H Sivank (Jan 11)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Roland Knall (Jan 11)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Guy Harris (Jan 05)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Andreas Sikkema (Jan 13)
- Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version Guy Harris (Jan 13)