Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Infrastructure for plugins (including Lua-based ones) to add their own menus


From: Tony Trinh <tony19 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:46:50 -0400

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com
wrote:


2. A single menu for plugins, with each plugin getting its own section.


Hmm. I don't understand the advantage of this approach over the current
solution. Can you clarify with an example?

My thought here is that after you have installed a few plugins, you
will have to hunt around for which menu they have installed themselves
in.

If there was a separate plugins menu, it would be obvious :-)


Ok, I see what you mean now. :) That seems like an issue that is solved by
user-friendly menu design (i.e., designing the menu names and hierarchy
such that the user can intuitively find them), plugin documentation, and/or
convention.

But I'm with you...I agree a top-level Plugins menu that automatically
groups the menus of plugins (upon plugin request or a preference setting)
could help mitigate the menu-hunting problem.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: