Re: how to second capwap decryptor for tshark

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:24 AM, Guy Harris wrote:

> That doesn't mean there are 3 B.A.T.M.A.N. dissectors or two CAPWAP dissectors, it means either that the code to 
> register them as potential UDP port dissectors doesn't eliminate duplicate registrations or that the code to print 
> those registrations doesn't eliminate them.  I'll look at fixing that bug.

Actually, the problem for CAPWAP is that, even if there's only one registered protocol and only one dissector source 
file, there are separate dissectors for "control" and "data" packets.  Unfortunately, there's no way to specify which 
of the dissectors should be used.  (A similar problem exists for B.A.T.M.A.N.)

This needs more work to fix.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe