Re: RFD: New language to write dissectors

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:

> From my perspective: I really use ~ 20 dissectors, why I need all of them?

...and if they're loaded at startup time and either interpreted or translated after being loaded, it might be easier to 
choose a subset of protocols (NetMon lets you do that, although I don't remember whether you can specify an arbitrary 
subset or if they just let you choose from subsets they've defined).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe