Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Query
From: "RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **" <lars.ruoff () alcatel-lucent com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:13:42 +0100
... not that there would have been any examples of recent submissions with that problem of course! (And if there would have been, any similarity is purely coincidental!) ;-) Lars ________________________________ From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Anders Broman Sent: jeudi 1 mars 2012 12:43 To: alexis.lagoutte () gmail com; Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Query Hi, It can be an advantage to submit in smaller steps to get those reviewed and any quirks ironed out rather than submitting a huge fulfledged dissector. Regards Anders ________________________________ From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Alexis La Goutte Sent: den 1 mars 2012 12:31 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Query Hi, Sur ! it is not a problem ! :-) Regards On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Tyson Key <tyson.key () gmail com<mailto:tyson.key () gmail com>> wrote: Hi Krishnamurthy, Whilst I'm not a core developer, I don't see why that would be a problem. (In fact, that's how I submitted some of my own dissectors). Tyson. On 1 March 2012 03:01, Krishnamurthy Mayya <krishnamurthymayya () gmail com<mailto:krishnamurthymayya () gmail com>> wrote:
Hi all, Is it ok if we create a new bug in wireshark bugzilla to say that we are working on writing the decoding module for these protocols and attach the patches, packets after we are done with it?? I just wanted to avoid the duplicate work getting done by many. I am currently working on writing the decoding modules based on few RFCs and will actually take some time to submit it back. Thanks in advance for the reply. Thanks and regards Krishnamurthy Mayya ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark-dev () wireshark org>> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org>?subject=unsubscribe
-- Fight Internet Censorship! http://www.eff.org http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon | 00447934365844<tel:00447934365844> ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark-dev () wireshark org>> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org>?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Query Tyson Key (Mar 01)
- Re: Query Alexis La Goutte (Mar 01)
- Re: Query Anders Broman (Mar 01)
- Re: Query RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** (Mar 01)
- Re: Query Anders Broman (Mar 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Query krishna hegde (Mar 16)
- Re: Query Bill Meier (Mar 16)
- Fwd: Query krishna hegde (Mar 19)
- Re: Query Ed Beroset (Mar 16)
- Re: Fwd: Query 阿超 (Mar 19)
- Re: Fwd: Query Jeff Morriss (Mar 19)
- Re: Query Alexis La Goutte (Mar 01)