Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: what's the meaning of 'Can't dissect FP frame because no per-frame info was attached!'


From: Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 06:40:36 +0100

damker skrev 2012-11-09 04:03:

I create a packet base at ERF/ATM AAL2 to dissect UMTS FP,the UMTS FP data is real data, but it says 'Can't dissect FP frame because no per-frame info was attached!' , is that something should define before umts fp?

In order to dissect FP you need to have information about how channels are set up etc
See http://wiki.wireshark.org/FP
http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/12388/could-you-tell-me-how-to-dissect-fp-over-udp
http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/11913/how-to-use-umts-fp-dissector
http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/6414/message-cant-dissect-fp-frame-because-no-per-frame-info-was-attached

http://wiki.wireshark.org/RLC
/*****************************************************************/
/* UDP framing format                                            */
/* -----------------------                                       */
/* Several people have asked about dissecting RLC by framing     */
/* PDUs over IP.  A suggested format over UDP has been defined   */
/* and implemented by this dissector, using the definitions      */
/* below. A link to an example program showing you how to encode */
/* these headers and send RLC PDUs on a UDP socket is provided   */
/* at http://wiki.wireshark.org/RLC                              */
/*                                                               */
/* A heuristic dissecter (enabled by a preference) will          */
/* recognise a signature at the beginning of these frames.       */
/* Until someone is using this format, suggestions for changes   */
/* are welcome.                                                  */
/*****************************************************************/

Recently code has been added to the NBAP dissector to set up the information needed to dissect FP if the NBAP set up signalling is present in the trace, this works for some cases
if no encryption is used.
Regards
Anders


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
              mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: