Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: WARNING **: Too many taps queued
From: Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson () googlemail com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:45:20 +0100
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl> wrote:
On 10/10/2012 03:48 PM, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:I ran some fuzztesting overnight (on a 32-bit WinXP VM, off of trunk), and when I checked on it this morning, I had "WARNING **: Too many taps queued" so many times, it scrolled beyond the top of my window. I've never seen this before. Could it be a result of the files I was testing? New bug in the trunk? Any insight would be appreciated.Your fuzz probably triggered a loop over a tapping point. There can be TAP_PACKET_QUEUE_LEN (=100) taps be pushed per packet. You should grab that fuzz and investigate the loop. Thanks, Jaap
I get it all the time. After convincing myself I wasn't losing any tap events I have been ignoring it. Would be interested to know what it meant... Martin
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- WARNING **: Too many taps queued mmann78 (Oct 10)
- Re: WARNING **: Too many taps queued Jeff Morriss (Oct 10)
- Re: WARNING **: Too many taps queued Jaap Keuter (Oct 10)
- Re: WARNING **: Too many taps queued Martin Mathieson (Oct 10)
- Re: WARNING **: Too many taps queued mmann78 (Oct 10)