Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Why the name "Wiretap"?


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:32:10 -0700


On Sep 28, 2012, at 1:48 PM, Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl> wrote:

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:23:16PM -0700, Gilbert Ramirez wrote:
Libpcap (...) has a wonderful BPF optimizing engine.

With lot of bugs...

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3054909&group_id=53067&atid=469577
http://seclists.org/tcpdump/2011/q4/83
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.network.tcpdump.devel/2265 (this one might have been fixed?)

That one might be "fixed" by not generating incorrect un-optimized code; the current code generates

        (008) ldb      [0]

rather than

        (008) ldb      [1]

when looking at the "type" subfield of the Frame Control field - that subfield is in the first octet.  There might 
still be an underlying optimizer bug (there certainly have been ones in the past that have been fixed).


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: