Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: port monitoring
From: sigafoose () gmail com
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:37:20 +0000
Something like for a display capture: !(http or https) But maybe you could try a capture filter as well, such as: port not 80 and not port 443 Cheers, Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: mike dodson <mikejd208 () gmail com> Sender: wireshark-users-bounces@wireshark.orgDate: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:18:43 To: <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Reply-To: Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Subject: [Wireshark-users] port monitoring ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- port monitoring mike dodson (Sep 04)
- Re: port monitoring Marco Zuppone (Sep 04)
- Re: port monitoring mike dodson (Sep 04)
- Re: port monitoring Guy Harris (Sep 04)
- Re: port monitoring Christopher Maynard (Sep 04)
- Re: port monitoring mike dodson (Sep 04)
- Re: port monitoring Marco Zuppone (Sep 04)
- Re: port monitoring sigafoose (Sep 04)
- Re: port monitoring Christopher Maynard (Sep 04)