Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13
From: Ambarisha B <b.ambarisha () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 04:03:25 +0530
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Ambarisha B <b.ambarisha () gmail com> wrote:
I understand that feasibility could be a concern in the sense that "we cut down memory usage without *any* loss in performance* because that would depend on how well we can tune the cache. I was thinking that the file backing the tvbuff would be a separate file and not the capture file. In that case, encryption and compression of capture file wouldn't matter. Am I missing something here?
On second thoughts, we don't need a separate file for backing up the tvb. But, if the file is compressed etc then the cache misses are going to be more costly. So, I get what you mean't there. Cheers Ambarish
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13, (continued)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Evan Huus (Apr 18)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Guy Harris (Apr 18)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Evan Huus (Apr 18)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Guy Harris (Apr 18)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Anders Broman (Apr 18)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Guy Harris (Apr 18)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Ambarisha B (Apr 20)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Anders Broman (Apr 20)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Ambarisha B (Apr 20)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Ambarisha B (Apr 20)
- Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13 Jeff Morriss (Apr 25)