Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Questions about New Export Objects


From: "jin.huang" <54jin.huang () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:01:38 +0800

Thank you ! 
I misunderstood the "packet number" meaning. Beause the objects I captured are very small, and can embedded in one 
packet, I'll try to capture large objects to check it!

2013-04-27



jin.huang



From:Guy Harris
Date:2013-04-27 11:40
Subject:Re: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about New Export Objects
To:"Developer support list for Wireshark"<wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Cc:


On Apr 26, 2013, at 8:09 PM, Jin Huang <54jin.huang () gmail com> wrote: 

Wireshark really can reassemble multiple TCP segments into an HTTP request or response.  
But the export objects function can only export objects in one packet, in the Wireshark Export dialog box, every 
export object has a corresponding packet number 

That's the frame number of the last frame that contains data from the object. 

It is *NOT* the only frame from which the save operation takes data. 

(Yes, I just tried it on an HTTP capture that has a GIF that took multiple TCP segments.  It saves the *reassembled* 
object, *not* just stuff from the last frame.) 
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> 
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev 
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev 
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe 
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: