Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Request for submission


From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:25:25 +0200

Ok,

Who has time to review this 100kB patch?

Thanks,
Jaap

On 04/09/2013 03:00 PM, Roland Knall wrote:
Hi

Could I please bump my request one more time on the buglist? I am
starting to work on some topics for new features on the dissector, and
only want to really start it, as soon as the existing patch went
through.

kind regards,
Roland

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:
Hello

Could I please kindly ask some of the main developers to commit the
patch in  https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8505 ?
Evan Huus, who kindly lend me an ear in getting the patch ready is
busy at the moment with exams, but has already cleared the patch.

All there is left to do would be to submit the patch.

It needs a once-over, as I haven't really looked at it since it was
rewritten to use TVBs, but most of what was in the first patch made
sense so it's probably fine.

I'm also in a theatre production starting next week. I don't know why
I thought lining that up with my exams was a good idea, but there you
go :P

(Which is to say: I'm going to be very scarce here for a while.)

Cheers,
Evan

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: