Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Taps should not use fd->flags.passed_dfilter (rtp, iax2, flow_analysis)
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 08:01:37 +0200
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 07:29:17AM +0200, Anders Broman wrote:
Jakub Zawadzki skrev 2013-08-15 14:04:Few GTK taps are using fd->flags.passed_dfilter as information whether given packet is displayed, this is little broken and might not work as intended. [cut] but if you are doing some rtp analysis and do refiltering like: frame.number == 1 ## nothing changes frame.number == 2 ## only frame #1 shows in stream analysis frame ## only frame #2 shows in stream analysis empty filter ## all frames from rtp stream shows up I don't have any iax2 capture file but it's probably broken like above. Conversations tap and 'limit to display filter' is implemented properly (gratz!) Attaching patch based on it. I'm not doing any rtp analysis, so please advice if it's proper way. Thanks.Looks correct to me :-)
What about:
frame.number == 1 ## nothing changes
It'll no longer work. Do we need 'limit to display filter' checkbox? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Taps should not use fd->flags.passed_dfilter (rtp, iax2, flow_analysis) Jakub Zawadzki (Aug 15)
- Re: Taps should not use fd->flags.passed_dfilter (rtp, iax2, flow_analysis) Anders Broman (Aug 15)
- Re: Taps should not use fd->flags.passed_dfilter (rtp, iax2, flow_analysis) Jakub Zawadzki (Aug 15)
- Re: Taps should not use fd->flags.passed_dfilter (rtp, iax2, flow_analysis) Anders Broman (Aug 15)