Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: r54005 by wmeier for packet-mq.c and packet-mq-pcf.c
From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:57:55 -0500
On 12/14/2013 5:30 AM, RobiOneKenobi wrote:
Yes, if it didn't disturb too much people to have such long lines, I will prefer that you revert this part (hf[] entries reformatting), otherwise I will follow the majority wishses
I've restored the single line per hf[] entry format in SVN #54005. Bill ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- r54005 by wmeier for packet-mq.c and packet-mq-pcf.c RobiOneKenobi (Dec 13)
- Re: r54005 by wmeier for packet-mq.c and packet-mq-pcf.c Bill Meier (Dec 13)
- Re: r54005 by wmeier for packet-mq.c and packet-mq-pcf.c RobiOneKenobi (Dec 14)
- Re: r54005 by wmeier for packet-mq.c and packet-mq-pcf.c Bill Meier (Dec 18)
- Re: r54005 by wmeier for packet-mq.c and packet-mq-pcf.c Bill Meier (Dec 18)
- Re: r54005 by wmeier for packet-mq.c and packet-mq-pcf.c RobiOneKenobi (Dec 14)
- Re: r54005 by wmeier for packet-mq.c and packet-mq-pcf.c Bill Meier (Dec 13)