Re: error: logical && with non-zero constant will always evaluate as true

[Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>]

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:37:42AM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
> In the meantime, I'm not really sure what the best workaround is...

What about using memchr() ?
This might be little stupid, but if we avoid warning this way (in cost
of some readability)...

Cheers,
 Kuba.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe