Re: Malformed Packet

["Ewgenij Sokolovski" <ewgenijkkg () gmx de>]

> I like having malformed in the protocol tree, or at least I like to be
> able
> to use the 'malformed' filter.
> Note that it is also added hidden when malformed is used as a type of
> expert info.


I think "malformed" is OK if there is an explanation, what "malformed" in the particular case means. The packet is 
malformed indeed and it's good for error search and hierarchical structure of reporting:) But without an explanation 
the user is quite confused...


So, should I submit an appropriate bug report to bugzilla? 


BR
Ewgenij
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe