Re: rev 50749: /trunk/ /trunk/: CMakeLists.txt

[Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>]

looks like there is no clang++ on that system but clang is there, and (using cmake),
I have _U_ properly defined in config.h

So the question is what is different on your system.

What I did to build (relative to svn/trunk/):
rm -rf build
mkdir build
cd build
CC=clang cmake ..
less config.h <== _U_ is now defined as it should
make (still compiling).

Can you please check that there is nothing cached, then you build config.h
and then check that?

Thanks
     Jörg

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 05:10:03PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> > > > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=50749
> > > >
> > > > User: jmayer
> > > > Date: 2013/07/21 05:53 AM
> > > >
> > > > Log:
> > > > Don't check for "APPLE" if what you really mean is "clang"
> > > Except for this doesn't work. At least on Mac OS X 10.8.4 with XCode 4.6.3
> > > I get now tons of warnings like
> > > [ 38%] Building C object epan/CMakeFiles/epan.dir/dissectors/packet-ieee80211-netmon.c.o
> > > /Users/tuexen/Documents/wireshark/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-ieee80211-netmon.c:70:82: warning: 
> > >     unused parameter 'data' [-Wunused-parameter]
> > > ...*tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, void *data _U_)
> > >                                                      ^
> > > 1 warning generated.
> > >
> > > That is why I checked for APPLE in
> > > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=49305
> > > However, I agree it is not perfect.
> >
> > Hmm, I assume you are using clang with that xcode version.
> Yes.
> > Are you working in a completely clean environment?
> Can't guarantee, but I think so. At least I don't have any other compilers installed.
> > I will try on my wifes snow leopard (whatever xcode version that is).
> That is pretty old... But you can give it a try.

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe