Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Build problems with qt
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:55:34 +0200
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:26:59AM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
Some of these errors look a bit like the ones I've been fighting, where the moc and uic binaries are Qt4 but the main include paths are Qt5 (I also had the opposite problem briefly: moc and uic were Qt5 but the main include paths were Qt4). It may be worth checking what paths and versions all of those are to make sure they line up.
No, except for the runtime libs everything on my system is qt5 (mostly because the rpms for qt4 and qt5 have not been built to coexists). Thanks Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Build problems with qt Joerg Mayer (Jul 23)
- Re: Build problems with qt Evan Huus (Jul 23)
- Re: Build problems with qt Joerg Mayer (Jul 23)
- Re: Build problems with qt Guy Harris (Jul 23)
- Re: Build problems with qt Joerg Mayer (Jul 23)
- Re: Build problems with qt Evan Huus (Jul 23)