Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Remove hf_ variables


From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:42:02 +0200

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 01:25:41PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:

On Jul 29, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl> wrote:

Is anyone attached to hf_ variables? ;)

There's no real need of them, and we can just replace them with
header_field_info structure.

I.e., pass a pointer to the relevant structure, rather than an array index into an internal array that can supply 
that pointer?

Yes.

I'm not sure there's a compelling reason (other than the effort involved in converting code) to keep the variables.

Being devil's advocate I think there's no good reason to convert it.
Saving few CPU cycles by not doing:
 - load variable into memory
 - avoid PROTO_REGISTRAR_GET_NTH()

and some cycles on startup + max 2-3 MB less in binary doesn't seems like good deal
against converting 90% of dissectors codebase :)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: