Proposed Gerrit workflow (was: Re: Notes from Sharkfest '13)

[Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu>]

Hi All,

2013/6/21 Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc () petit-huguenin org>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/20/2013 04:52 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> > On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc () petit-huguenin org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 06/20/2013 02:17 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> > >
> > > > Advantates: - I'm not sure that an in-house equivalent (e.g. Gerrit
> > > > plus a private repository) would be better than what Github offers.
> > >
> > > Yes, Gerrit is better than github:
> >
> > Presumably you mean "Gerrit plus a private repository is better than
> > github", as Gerrit, as far as I can tell, is just software that works with
> > a Git repository.
>
> Yes, although managing repositories being what Gerrit do, Gerrit without a
> least one repository would be a very boring application.
:-)

I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit
to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow .
Please check it and share your opinion.

Cheers,
Balint
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe